References

Batmyagmar D, Kundi M, Ponocny-Seliger E High intensity endurance training is associated with better quality of life, but not with improved cognitive functions in elderly marathon runners. Sci Rep. 2019; 9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41010-w

Brunner D, Abramovitch A, Etherton J. A yoga program for cognitive enhancement. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12:(8) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182366

Fukuyama F. Our Posthuman Future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution.London: Profile Books; 2002

Koren G, Korn L. The Use of Methylphenidate for Cognitive Enhancement in Young Healthy Adults The Clinical and Ethical Debates. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021; 41:(2)100-102 https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001336

Maier LJ, Ferris JA, Winstock AR. Pharmacological cognitive enhancement among non-ADHD individuals—A cross-sectional study in 15 countries. Int J Drug Policy. 2018; 58:104-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.05.009

Mann J. Cognitive enhancing drug use by students in the context of neoliberalism: cheating? Or a legitimate expression of competitive entrepreneurialism?. Int J Drug Policy. 2021; 95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102907

Cognitive-enhancing drugs and the workplace. 2015. bma_cognitive_enhancing_drugs_and_the_workplace_oct_2019.pdf

Sharif S, Guirguis A, Fergus S, Schifano F. The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2021; 11 https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030355

Zaami S, Tagliabracci A, Berretta P Use of Methylphenidate Analogues as Cognitive Enhancers: The Prelude to Cosmetic Neurology and an Ethical Issue. Front. Psychiatry. 2020; 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01006

When should pharmacological cognitive enhancers be used?

02 April 2022
Volume 4 · Issue 4

Abstract

The use of cognitive enhancers are associated with the treatment of medical disorders such as dementia and ADHD, but what are the ethical-clinical considerations surrounding them being taken in non-clinically prescribed circumstances?

Pharmacological cognitive enhancers (PCEs) are licensed to improve cognitive functioning in those suffering from specific medical disorders like dementia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy, with Nicholson et al (2015) observing that ‘healthy individuals use PCEs without a prescription for non-medical purposes … [and is] ‘largely restricted to students, with very little evidence for use in working populations.’

In the largest study on PCEs conducted, Maier et al (2018) reported on data collected from over 100 000 participants in 15 countries as part of the Global Drug Survey 2015 and 2017. They found that 4.9% and 13.7% of the global samples, respectively, reported the 12-month use of prescription or illegal stimulants and/or modafinil to improve work or study performance, an average increase of 180%. Expanding on this, while Mann (2021) ascribes this trend to be associated with students in higher education, he acknowledges that accurate prevalence rates are imprecise amonst stuents, ranging from 5% to 35% of student populations. However, Sharif et al (2021) cite evidence that the lifetime prevalence rate of prescribed PCEs intake for non-medical reasons, ‘as a self-attempt to increase cognitive performances, among university students in the UK and Ireland has been estimated to be around 10%.’

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Prescribing Practice and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for prescribing professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month