References

Alwan S, Chambers CD. Identifying human teratogens: an update. J Pediatr Genet. 2015; 4:(2)39-41 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1556745

Baniaghil AS, Ghasemi S, Rezaei-Aval M, Behnampour N. Effect of communication skills training using the Calgary-Cambridge model on interviewing skills among midwifery students: a randomized controlled trial. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022; 27:(1)24-29 https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_42_20

Bhakta A, Goel R. Causes and treatment of nausea and vomiting. Prescriber. 2017; 28:(7)17-23 https://doi.org/10.1002/psb.1591

Boelig RC, Barton SJ, Saccone G, Kelly AJ, Edwards SJ, Berghella V. Interventions for treating hyperemesis gravidarum: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31:(18)2492-2505 https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1342805

Dennes C. What are Consultation Models for?. InnovAiT. 2013; 6:(9)592-599

Electronic Medicines Compendium. 2018. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/4318 (accessed 24 September 2022)

Electronic Medicines Compendium. 2020. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/4553/smpc

Etwel F, Faught LH, Rieder MJ, Koren G. The Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome After First Trimester Exposure to H1 Antihistamines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drug Saf. 2017; 40:(2)121-132 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-016-0479-9

Gill S. K., Einarson A. The Safety of Drugs for the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy. Expert Opinion Drug Safety. 2007; 6:(6)685-694 https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.6.6.685

2020. BNF 80 (British National Formulary). BMJ Group.London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2020

Koren G. Safety considerations surrounding use of treatment options for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017; 16:(11)1227-1234 https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2017.1361403

Locock L, Alexander J, Rozmovits L. Women's responses to nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Midwifery. 2008; 24:(2)143-152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.001

Magee LA, Mazzotta P, Koren G. Evidence-based view of safety and effectiveness of pharmacologic therapy for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186:S256-S261 https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.122596

Manalastas G, Noble LM, Viney R, Griffin AE. What does the structure of a medical consultation look like? A new method for visualising doctor-patient communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2021; 104:(6)1387-1397 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.026

Matthews A, Dowswell T, Haas DM, Doyle M, O'Mathúna DP. Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007575.pub2

Munson E, Willcox A. Applying the Calgary-Cambridge model. Practice Nursing. 2007; 18:464-468 https://doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2007.18.9.27158

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3/chapter/Recommendations#gestational-diabetes (accessed 31 October 2022)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Doxylamine/pyridoxine (Xonvea) for treating nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/advice/es20/evidence/evidence-review-pdf-6836042269 (accessed 24 October 2022)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy – what causes it?. 2021a. https://tinyurl.com/35trs3sz (accessed 24 October 2022)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Advantages and disadvantages of different pharmacological treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. 2021b. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng201/resources/table-1-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-different-pharmacological-treatments-for-nausea-and-vomiting-in-pregnancy-pdf-9204302125 (accessed 24 October 2022)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code. Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses, Midwives and Nursing Associates. 2018. https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/nmc-publications/nmc-code.pdf (accessed 24 October 2022)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards for prescribers. 2019. https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/standards-for-post-registration/standards-for-prescribers/ (accessed 24 October 2022)

O'Donnell A, McParlin C, Robson SC Treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum and nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: a systematic review and economic assessment. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2016; 20:(74)1-268 https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20740

Oxford Medical Education. History Taking – Overview. 2021. https://oxfordmedicaleducation.com/history/medical-general/ (accessed 24 October 2022)

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Diagnosis and Treatment of gestational diabetes. [Scientific impact paper no. 23]. 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/scientific-impact-papers/diagnosis-and-treatment-of-gestational-diabetes-scientific-impact-paper-no-23/ (accessed 24 October 2022)

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum. [Green top guideline No 69]. 2016. https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/the-management-of-nausea-and-vomiting-of-pregnancy-and-hyperemesis-gravidarum-green-top-guideline-no-69/ (accessed 24 October 2022)

Zhong W, Shahbaz O, Teskey G Mechanisms of nausea and vomiting: current knowledge and recent advances in intracellular emetic signaling systems. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22:(11) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115797

Non-medical midwifery prescribing of an antiemetic for a glucose tolerance test: a case study

02 November 2022
Volume 4 · Issue 11

Abstract

This is a case study of a 26-week pregnant woman requiring an antiemetic before a glucose tolerance test and the prescribing decision that a non-medical midwifery prescriber needed to make in the outpatient setting. The case study demonstrates how the prescriber demonstrated the Royal Pharmaceutical Society competencies. The Calgary-Cambridge model was used to assess the patient. There are no local or national guidelines for this situation with very limited evidence available to assess the effectiveness of the different antiemetics. The consultant's advice in the local setting is to prescribe a cyclizine 50mg tablet. This case study evaluates the available evidence and guidelines and concludes that prescribing cyclizine in this scenario is reasonable in the absence of any good evidence.

This is a case study of a 26-week pregnant woman, pseudonym Saafia, who required an antiemetic prior to commencing a glucose tolerance test (GTT) in an outpatient setting. A GTT requires the woman to drink a sugary drink to test for gestational diabetes (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), 2011). Saafia had attempted a GTT previously but had been unable to complete it as she vomited the drink after ingestion. This article will consider the different prescribing options available to a non-medical midwifery prescriber working in this outpatient setting. The Calgary-Cambridge consultation model was used to assess the patient and to reach a shared prescribing decision. It is part of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) code that midwives should practise safely by prescribing within the limits of their competency (NMC, 2018) and the NMC has adopted the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) competency framework (NMC, 2019). It is demonstrated throughout the article how the prescriber demonstrated these competencies in this case.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Prescribing Practice and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for prescribing professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month