References

Flintholm Raft C, Bjerrum L, Arpi M, Otto Jarløv J, Nygaard Jensen J. Delayed antibiotic prescription for upper respiratory tract infections in children under primary care: Physicians' views. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017; 23:(1)190-195

Høye S, Jan C, Frich JC, Lindbæk M. Delayed prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study of GPs' views and experiences. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60:(581)907-12

Respiratory Tract Infections: prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in Adults and Children in primary care.London: NICE; 2008

Peters S, Rowbotham S, Chisholm A Managing self-limiting respiratory tract infections: A qualitative study of the usefulness of the delayed prescribing strategy. Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61:(590)e579-89

Ryves R, Eyles C, Moore M, McDermott L, Little P, Leydon GM. Understanding the delayed prescribing of antibiotics for respiratory tract infection in primary care: a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open. 2016; 6:(11)

Sargent L, McCullough A, Del Mar C, Lowe J. Using theory to explore facilitators and barriers to delayed prescribing in Australia: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behaviour Change Wheel. BMC Fam Pract. 2017; 18:(1)

Spurling GKP, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, Foxlee R, Farley R. Delayed antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; (9)1465-1858

Delayed antibiotic prescribing

02 August 2019
Volume 1 · Issue 8

Abstract

Ruth Paterson and Tracy Black provide an overview of recently published articles that may be of interest to non-medical prescribers. Should you wish to look at any of the articles in more detail, a full reference is given

Delayed prescriptions are a recommended strategy for people presenting with upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). It involves giving a prescription to a patient with instructions to use it if symptoms persist or worsen. It appears to have clinical benefit, a Cochrane review of 11 randomised controlled trials reported a reduction in rates of immediate prescriptions compared to delayed prescriptions (93% vs 32%) (Spurling et al, 2017). Yet, despite this evidence and recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2008) advocating their use, there appears to be reticence in the prescribing community to regularly issue them. This research roundup will explore some of the evidence about prescribers' perceptions of delayed prescriptions for people presenting to primary care with URTIs. A search of the literature yielded five articles; four qualitative studies and one quantitative survey. Three of the studies explored views of UK-based prescribers, two were from Scandanavia and one from Australia.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Prescribing Practice and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for prescribing professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month