References

Borthwick AM. Occupational imperialism at work: the case of podiatric surgery. Br J Pod. 2001; 4.70-9

Borthwick A. Professions allied to medicine and prescribing. In: Bradley E, Nolan P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008

Borthwick A, Kilmartin TE, Freeman C, Wilson N. Allied Health Prescribing. In: Franklin P. : Springer International Publishing; 2017

Borthwick AM, Maher AJ. Podiatry and Medicines. Pod Now. 2020; 23:(10)21-28

Borthwick AM, Short AJ, Nancarrow SA, Boyce R. Non-medical prescribing in Australasia and the UK: the case of podiatry. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2010; 3:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-1

Bourdieu P. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory. 1989; 7:(1)14-25 https://doi.org/10.2307/202060

Carey N, Edwards J, Otter S A comparative case study of prescribing and non-prescribing physiotherapists and podiatrists. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05918-8

College of Podiatry. PASCOM 10 - The Podiatry Audit Tool. 2020. http://www.pascom-10.com/ (accessed 15 April 2022)

NHS England. Consultation on proposed amendments to the list of controlled drugs that podiatrists can independently prescribe across the United Kingdom. 2020. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/podiatrist-consultation-summary.pdf (accessed 14 February 2022)

Dagnall C. History of the Society 1945-1995. J Br Podiatr Med Surg. 1995; 50:21-27

Dawson J, Coffey J, Doll H A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. Qual Life Res. 2006; 15:(7)1211-1222 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0061-5

Donabedian A. Special article: The quality of care : How can it be assessed ?. JAMA. 1998; 260:(12)1743-1748

Gallagher CT. UK non⊠medical CD prescribing law: permissive or restrictive?. Prescriber. 2021; 32:(3)15-19 https://doi.org/10.1002/psb.1900

Gilheany MF, Borthwick AM. Recent developments in podiatric prescribing in the UK and Australia. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2009; 2:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-37

HCPC. Registrant Snapshot. 3rd November 2020. 2020. https://www.hcpc-uk.org/about-us/insights-and-data/the-register/registrant-snapshot---3-november-2020/ (accessed 2020 Dec 21)

Hlaing T, Hollister L, Aaland M. Trauma Registry Data Validation: Essential for Quality Trauma Care. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2006; 61:(6)1400-1407 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000195732.64475.87

Statutory Instrument 2012 No. 1916.London: HMSO; 2012

Nashville podiatrist, who gave opioids to “anyone,” to plead guilty in drug dealing case. 2020. https://eu.tennessean.com/story/news/health/2020/02/15/nashville-podiatrist-timothy-abbot-opioid-prescriptions-to-plead-guilty-drug-dealing/4754499002/ (accessed 21 Decemver 2020)

Kosy JD, Kassam AAM, Hockings M. National Joint Registry data inaccuracy: a threat to proper reporting. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2013; 74:(12)691-693 https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2013.74.12.691

Maher A. Service Evaluation, Outcome Measurement and PASCOM-10. A review of the literature. Pod Now. 2016; 19:(12)16-20

PASCOM-10. Invasive domain User Guide. Version 2.1. August 2018. 2018. https://www.pascom-10.com/documents/PASCOM-10%20User%20Guide%20v2.1%20Aug%202018.pdf (accessed 14 February 2018)

Quality assessment in health. 1984. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.288.6428.1470

NHS England. NHS Friends and Family Test. No date. https://www.england.nhs.uk/fft/ (accessed 14 February 2022)

NHS. Consultation on proposed amendments to the list of controlled drugs that podiatrists can independently prescribe across the United Kingdom. 2020. https://www.engage.england.nhs.uk/consultation/podiatrists/ (accessed 19 May 2022)

Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.London: HMSO; 1971

Statutory Instrument 2001 No. 3998.London: HMSO; 2001

Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future. J Mark. 1985; 49:(4)41-50 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430

Rasmussen L, Bøtker H, Jensen L, Ravkilde J, Riber L, Nielesen P, Andreasen J, Jakobsen C. Quality assurance of the Western Denmark Heart Registry, a popultation-based healthcare register. Danish Medical Journal. 2017; 64:(10)1-7

Rudge G, Tollafield D. A critical assessment of a new evaluation tool for podiatric surgical outcome analysis. Br J Pod. 2003; 6:(4)109-119

The College of Podiatry. National Data Reports 2019. 2019. https://www.pascom-10.com/national-reports/PASCOMNationalDataReport2019.pdf (accessed 21 December 2021)

Tollafield DR, Parmer DG. Setting standards for day care foot surgery. A quinquennial review. Part I. Br J Podiatr Med Surg. 1994; 6:(1)7-20

Willis E. Introduction: taking stock of medical dominance. Health Sociology Review. 2006; 15:(5)421-431 https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2006.15.5.421

An audit of the prescription and supply of medicines by podiatric surgery teams in the UK

02 June 2022
Volume 4 · Issue 6

Abstract

Aim

To gain a greater understanding of the methods used by podiatric surgeons to access medicines in the UK. Within that, it is also relevant to establish the range and quantity of medicines utilised to support patient care. With the advent of independent prescribing for podiatrists, the authors were keen to identify whether prescribing was being adopted by a sub-speciality of the podiatry profession and whether alternate means of accessing medicines, such as Patient Group Directions or exemptions remain relevant in clinical practice.

Methods

The PASCOM 10 system was accessed to generate reports for the 2019 calendar year relating to podiatric surgery. The following reports were requested; procedures, fixations, anaesthesia, demographics, medications, post-treatment sequelae, patient satisfaction (PSQ-10), Manchester Oxford foot/ankle questionnaire (MOXFQ), providers and referrals.

Results

In 2019 there were 11189 admissions for podiatric surgery in England recorded on the PASCOM 10 database. A total of 103 surgery centres contributed data resulting in 18497 procedures. Care was primarily offered in NHS settings accounting for 91% of activity, 94% of these procedures were performed under a local anaesthetic block. 18576 medicines were supplied, administered or prescribed from a list of 70 individual items. 29% of all medicines were prescribed by a podiatrist. Controlled drugs accounted for 28.7% of all recorded medicines.

Conclusions

Through analysis of PASCOM 10 data, the range of medicines accessed by podiatric surgeons and their teams to support patient care perioperatively and the routes of accessing these medicines have been identified. Encouragingly, independent prescribing appears to be a frequent choice for accessing certain medicines. There is thorough evidence of a need for greater prescribing rights. Of note, it appears the management of postoperative pain could be improved with wider access to controlled drugs, namely opioid analgesics. PASCOM-10 has the capacity to provide revealing data on prescribing in podiatric clinical practice that is unique in the UK, though more work is required to ensure the validity of the dataset.

In the UK, ‘prescription only’ medicines are one of three distinct categories of medicine, reflecting the relative risk associated with their use (Borthwick et al, 2010). Designated as such within the terms of the Medicines Act (1968), prescription-only medicines (POMs) were initially intended to be issued by a very limited number of ‘approved prescriber’ professions, notably doctors, dentists and vets (Borthwick, 2008). At the time, nurses or allied health professionals (including podiatrists) were not considered potential prescribers. In the years since, it has become clear that advances in scope of practice and requirements in educational qualifications amongs these professions have shifted significantly (Borthwick and Maher, 2020).

One such example is the development of podiatric surgery in England, which would not have been possible without first securing access to medicines. Within this area, perhaps the most important class of medicines was local anaesthetics (Dagnall, 1995; Borthwick, 2001). Access to local anaesthetics allowed for the safe development of pain-free skin and nail surgery procedures but surgical techniques soon evolved and with that, the requirement for greater access to medicines. More advanced surgical techniques brought with them a need for post-operative analgesia, pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis and perioperative thromboprophylaxis, to name a few. In the latter part of the 20th century, there was then a pressing need to improve access to medicines.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Prescribing Practice and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for prescribing professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month