References

Laprise C. It's time to take a sustainable approach to health care in the face of the challenges of the 21st century. One Health. 2023; 16

Legrand J, Aubin-Auger I, De Bary L, Fossembas E, Baruch D, Malmartel A. Sustainable development in general practice. Fam Pract. 2023;

Parker J. Barriers to green inhaler prescribing: ethical issues in environmentally sustainable clinical practice. J Med Ethics. 2023; 49:(2)92-98

Royal Pharmaceutical Society. The Single Competency Framework. 2021. https://www.rpharms.com/resources/frameworks/prescribers-competency-framework (accessed 28 April 2023)

Examining sustainable practice in prescribing

02 May 2023
Volume 5 · Issue 5

Abstract

Deborah Robertson provides an overview of recently published articles that may be of interest to non-medical prescribers. Should you wish to look at any of the papers in more detail, a full reference is provided

Last month, the research roundup provided you with an overview of articles looking at prescribing in a young population. This month, we look at the emerging concept of green and sustainable prescribing. The first article examines barriers to green inhaler prescribing in clinical practice, while the second has a focus on general practice and sustainability. Finally, we review a perspective piece on taking a sustainable approach to healthcare in the 21st century.

Barriers to green inhaler prescribing: ethical issues in environmentally sustainable clinical practice

This article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, sought to identify the barriers to prescribing more environmentally friendly inhalers (Parker, 2023). One of the drivers for this article was the 2020 NHS declaration that it intended to become net carbon neutral for all emissions under its direct control by 2040.

One known area of prescribing that contributed to greenhouse gas emissions was that of the prescribing of metered- dose inhalers. It was identified that many patients could, in fact, move from these traditionally used inhalers to dry powder inhalers, which do not contain these powerful greenhouse gases without any loss of therapeutic effect. The authors of the paper give a very good and useful overview of the carbon footprint of inhaler prescribing which sets the paper well and gives valuable context.

The article discusses two ethical issues that may be barriers to switching from metered dose inhalers. The first is that some patients do not wish to switch from their inhalers, especially if they have been using the same type for a long time. This raises a question of moral justification on the part of the patient and invokes ethical issues around autonomy. They follow up with how the prescribers could respond to patient refusal to switch and issues around informed consent and the trust relationship.

The second issue discussed is that of cost. Dry powder inhalers are more expensive and the article does allude to the fact that switching from the cheapest metered dose inhalers to the dry powder could attract an annual cost increase of £12.7 million for every 10% of inhalers changed. The authors make the point that this is not a given increase and that some targeted prescribing changes could mitigate this cost.

They conclude that with an annual saving of 58 kilotons of carbon dioxide emissions, the task of changing inhalers is urgent and important.

Sustainable development in general practice

This paper, published in the Journal of Family Practice, looks at sustainable development in general practice (Legrand et al, 2023). The authors conducted this study in the primary care arena in France. The qualitative study sought to explore the practices in the chosen population of study with regards to sustainability and to identify any actions that may be appropriate and achievable to be applied to the wider healthcare arena.

The paper identifies that around 4–5% of all global carbon emissions come from healthcare practices. They also suggest that previous evidence shows healthcare practitioners in general practice do not implement sustainable development measures; largely, they identify physicians as being less than proactive.

They conducted a qualitative study of 12 GPs based in France, and used semi-structured interviews, either face to face or over the telephone, to gather data on waste management, relationships between health professionals, the practice of sustainable development and the activity of the GPs themselves.

Data analysis on demographics showed the mean age of the GPs involved in the research was 42.8 years, working largely in an urban environment. From analysis of responses four themes emerged.

First, there was a concern over balancing the need to act to reduce environmental impact with the constraints related to the medical care that was needed to manage conditions effectively. The second theme was around thinking about how to integrate sustainable development into everyday practice, which necessitates a commitment from the GPs. Another theme was around the need to reassess consumption and prescribing, and a move to preventive practices.

Finally, this needed to be seen in light of the GP as a role model for their patients, as well as their role as business leaders and as members of the healthcare system.

What emerged was that the GPs were concerned about sustainability and carbon footprint, and that many had already begun to be involved in implementing practices to reduce emissions. The article also highlights tools that are available to assist with a move towards a more sustainable healthcare model, and that the impact should continue to be investigated and assessed.

Time to take a sustainable approach to healthcare in the face of 21st-century challenges

This final article, published in the journal One Health, is worth looking at to give a useful overview of this topic (Laprise, 2023). The author starts by giving a good context to climate change and its relationship with health issues and healthcare.

The aim of the article is to give a broader overview of the context we are living in and how it affects people's health globally. It looks at factors such as the ageing population and comorbidities, alongside human health challenges, globalisation and the environment. Notable mention is given to the COVID-19 pandemic and its influence. The author investigates and outlines the issues of environmental health and air pollution, globalisation and the significant increase in population movement and migration, and its impact on healthcare systems.

The article then focuses on an integrated and sustainable approach to healthcare where a balance must be found between needs and resources.

The author suggests actions need to be taken at an individual and local level, but also the need for national and international focus. They present a sustainable health model in the paper encompassing social, economic and physical environments, and vulnerabilities and health.

Their proposed approach acknowledges that everyone has a role to play but that policy makers and stakeholders need to work together, in partnership with the population, to develop intersectional research projects to meet the needs of the community.

Conclusion

Sustainable prescribing may be a new concept to many of you and, of course, it is reflected in the 2021 Competency Framework published by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS, 2021) and, therefore, needs to be incorporated into your practice. These articles will help you understand the need to move to a more sustainable prescribing practice and give you tools and information to put this into practice.